Personal Attacks On Believers By Believers (No!)
How long will all of you attack others; how long will you
tear them down as if they were leaning down walls or broken down fences?
-Psalm 62:3 (CEB)
![]() |
Photo: Pixabay |
Personal attacks against people we donāt like is common
these days, from Christian to Christian.
Sometimes the attacker will doubt the authenticity of the personās faith
they are attacking. But the attacker
brings their own legitimacy into question, by their brazen attacks on a child
of God.
Nothing is wrong with arguing, debating, and
discussing. What is wrong is attacking
people. Personal attacks are wrong.
Malicious gossip, slander, and maligning are wrong for the
believer. Personal attacks is the style
of Satan and when we accuse brothers or sisters, we are joining with Satan. You become just like the ones who attacked
Jesus, who thought they were the rightful standard bearers of God, when they
were actually attacking the Son of God.
The attacker has the audacity, presumption, and arrogance to
self-righteously believe that they are doing Godās work in attacking
'heretics'. After all, false prophets or
teachers of heresy are the enemies of God who must be punished, at least
through verbal or written attacks.
Attacking what you believe is false doctrine, teaching, or prophecy is
one thing; when it is done civilly; but personal attacks are wrong.
It is a problem when a person begins there opinion piece or
argument with, (this name is fictional) āTed Smith is wrongā. Then it goes from bad to worse when they say,
āTed Smith is just bad, because of what he teaches, or doesā. And then it might even get worse when they
say or write, or it is strongly implied that, āGod is very angry with Ted
Smith!ā
It would be more authentic and healthier to say, āWhat Ted
Smith teaches really makes me madā. We
might be a bit uncomfortable with your anger, but at least you are not
personally attacking Mr. Smith. We can
then ask, āWhat teaching is it that makes you mad?ā, and we have a dialogue or
discussion going.
When I was a kid, I heard the phrase, āongoing theological
debateā, and I was intrigued. Ever
since, I have seen and heard that there is a debate going on. Debate, discussion, dialogue, and question
and answer are all super good. Saying,
āI donāt knowā, and being a lifelong learner is also a good thing.
Humility, meekness, love, patience, and being a listener are
good characteristics. Being able to say
that we differ, but we are bound in the unity of the Spirit and the bond of
peace, is a good thing. And unity does not
mean uniformity.
Dialogue and debate, from a place of love is the better way.
Comments
Post a Comment